The Implications of Classifying Workers as
Employees vs. Independent Contractors

In today’s gig economy and flexible work environment, businesses often face the critical decision of classifying workers as either employees or independent contractors. This classification has profound implications, particularly in terms of tax obligations, legal liabilities, and worker protections. Misclassifying a worker can lead to significant financial and operational consequences for both the business and the individual. This article explores the IRS rules for determining worker status, the ramifications of misclassification, strategies for businesses to avoid errors, and other relevant considerations as of 2025.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relies on common law rules to classify workers, focusing on the degree of control and independence in the working relationship. There is no single definitive test; instead, the IRS evaluates the entire relationship holistically, with no set number of factors required to tip the scale. The key factors are grouped into three main categories:
Businesses must document the factors supporting their classification decision. If uncertainty persists, either the business or worker can file Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, for an official IRS ruling, though this process can take at least six months. No major updates to these rules were noted in 2025 IRS guidance.
Misclassifying an employee as an independent contractor—intentionally or not—can trigger severe consequences under federal and state laws. For businesses, the primary incentive to misclassify is avoiding payroll taxes, benefits, and labor protections, but the risks far outweigh the short-term savings. Workers, meanwhile, suffer from lost entitlements and increased personal burdens.
If the IRS determines a misclassification without a “reasonable basis” (e.g., consistent treatment and proper filings), the business becomes liable for unpaid employment taxes, including Social Security, Medicare, and federal unemployment taxes that should have been withheld and matched. Penalties vary based on whether the misclassification is deemed unintentional or intentional:
Beyond IRS penalties, businesses may face:
The IRS offers some relief through the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP), where eligible businesses can reclassify workers as employees prospectively and pay reduced penalties (typically 10% of the prior year’s employment tax liability on those workers’ compensation), avoiding full audits and back taxes.
Misclassified workers are denied key protections and benefits afforded to employees, including minimum wage, overtime pay, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, family and medical leave, and anti-discrimination safeguards under laws like the FLSA and Title VII. They must handle their own tax filings, paying self-employment taxes (15.3% for Social Security and Medicare) without employer matching, which can lead to underpayment and personal IRS penalties. Workers can seek redress by filing Form 8919 to report uncollected taxes on their income tax return or Form SS-8 for a status determination, potentially recovering back wages through the Department of Labor (DOL), which secured $24 million for 20,000 misclassified workers in FY 2023.
To mitigate risks, businesses should adopt proactive measures rooted in compliance and documentation:
Beyond taxes, classification affects broader aspects of business operations and worker rights. Employees typically receive benefits like health insurance, paid leave, and retirement plans, increasing costs for employers but enhancing retention. Independent contractors offer flexibility and lower overhead but may demand higher rates to cover self-employment taxes and lack of protections. State laws vary; for instance, California’s ABC test presumes employee status unless the business proves otherwise, leading to stricter enforcement. Recent 2025 DOL signals suggest a potential shift toward employer-friendly standards, but misclassification remains a hot enforcement area with ongoing litigation risks. Businesses should also consider non-tax implications, such as intellectual property ownership (employees’ work is often company-owned) and liability for worker actions.
In summary, proper worker classification is essential for compliance, cost management, and ethical operations. Businesses are advised to prioritize accuracy over convenience to avoid the cascading effects of misclassification. For personalized advice, consult a tax or legal professional.
The information presented here should not be construed as legal, tax, accounting, or valuation advice. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice and after a thorough examination of the particular situation.